criminal law cases 2018 - An Overview
criminal law cases 2018 - An Overview
Blog Article
However, in an effort to strike a balance between the rights of citizens along with the plans that are executed by the authorities for the welfare, financial development and prosperity of your country, the Court did not produce a definitive ruling about the pending construction of your grid station, but, with the consent of both parties, ordered a review and report of grid project through the National Engineering Services of Pakistan (NESPAK) to recommend alterations and location alternatives.
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming on the main case, Additionally it is a effectively-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is issue on the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings over the evidence.
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding achieved via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your conclusion or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court might interfere with the summary or even the finding and mold the relief to really make it suitable for the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified by the decision in the Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced to your period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے website اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty for the accused who intentionally murdered the victim.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it needs legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be generated and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a close-by electricity grid station on account of likely health risks and hazards.
Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses for example self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which may cause reduced charges or acquittal.
10. Without touching the merits of your case in the issue of annual increases within the pensionary emoluments from the petitioner, in terms of policy decision in the provincial government, this kind of annual increase, if permissible in the case of employees of KMC, requires further assessment to be made because of the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance due to funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
However, it’s essential to note that the application of your death penalty is matter to several legal safeguards and because of process to ensure fair trials.
Pakistan’s legal system is not really without flaws: overhauling is overdue and the regulation regarding murder necessitates major reconsideration and clarification. For the time being, the least that can be done is to verify that the First Investigation Report (FIR) is registered with honesty and after properly ascertaining the facts.